Since Clinton has come into office, he has pushed for universal health care. Alongside of him was his devoted wife who campaigned relentlessly to convince people that the insurance and pharmaceutical companies are taking advantage and have too much control. After extreme fighting and words and flying from here to the other side of the country, the battle was lost, but the war was not over.
1993 didn't work. But now it's 2010. There is an unimaginable bailout circus, an unforgivable number of unemployed, and an unprecedented president. Yes, times are always changing, but not like this. Not that persuasion or scare tactics are necessary, but just saying, the picture right in front of us is enough.
Yes, it's 2010 and it's the year for health care. What is really unknown is how much premiums are really going to cost (it may actually still continue to get higher for some), what new loopholes large companies will jump through, and what exactly is in that ten pound book.
The answers we have now could be well worth the venturing in the obscure. Insurance will be accessible to all. Hopefully, corruption and fraud will be minimized if hopefully a magnifying glass is held steadily and accurately. Pre-existing conditions and insurance caps will not be factors in dropping a patient. All of this is important, even though many people and critics don't see it that way.
Therefore, there will be more battles to fight. This is one won, but not the end of a long war of the maintenance of the nation's health for decades to come.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Monday, March 15, 2010
Let's Party!
"You have to fight for your right to party!"
So often are we asked the question of what our views are. It's like asking, "what size are you," but getting more of a "what do you want on your burger" kind of answer. It's an uncomfortable question to ask, but we think we know exactly where we stand - and everyone has a unique and instilled view on each issue. With so much response diversity, let's switch over to second person.
Are you a Democrat or Republican? OK, now are you a liberal or moderate? Are you sure? Have you ever considered the Tea Party, Libertarian, or even being Independent?
Now to first person. If only I could accurately explain what each stand for. Truthfully speaking, I just know the basics. Enough to know where I stand.
And on to third person. When I think of Democrats, I think of church camp where we all get in a circle and hold hands. Say some prayers and help out the world! Donations (ehem taxes, though that's not voluntary for the most part) are seized and distributed to those in need. The preacher, though, he dresses so nicely and this is his only job. No wonder he's so happy all the time. God is on his side and so is the cash before it goes out to the needy??
Republicans. They are rebels in their own right. What what they justify to themselves as right. Abortion equals murder even when the definition of life has not clearly been defined and when the root of problem may not exactly be that woman has a fetus. The issue goes deeper: poor and incomplete sex education, a proper role model, rape. And then there's healthcare. I'm sorry, only Republicans and their grandchildren are allowed the best; not the struggling workforce nor those who were recently laid off because the Repub's wealthy friends ignored signs of a collapse as long as money was coming in.
Then there's the Tea Party and Libertarians who don't agree with taxes and believe that everyone should fend for themselves no matter what. That's how I interpret it. If anyone would like to correct me then I would welcome that. Problem is, the message is not coming off strong enough and their's no champion. I can see that taxes, quite blantantly, sucks, but what is the answer then? Smaller government, but then there will be those who take advantage of the unregulated system. It's not so easy, this is a capitalist country. People are greed and selfish here. That seems to be how the economy just collapsed in the first place and why many are in debt. Wall Street had no rules and credit card companies didn't either. And now, look at America.
I guess there's always the Green and Constitution, however, they kind of impose ideas onto people that I would allow to more of a personal decision. I love God and His environment, don't get me wrong, but again, I am in this country which is trying with all its might to emphasize freedom. I realize that if I had to write an article called "Why Congress made this law" that money would be mention threes times for every mention of freedom, but hey, there other countries worse off. That is not an excuse, but it is a realization.
In the meantime, I'd like to vote independently. Yes, Independent. That is my choice for making choices on many an issue without having to play along with the rest of the party.
Want to know the stances on issues? Party on here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_parties_in_the_United_States#Modern_U.S._political_party_system
So often are we asked the question of what our views are. It's like asking, "what size are you," but getting more of a "what do you want on your burger" kind of answer. It's an uncomfortable question to ask, but we think we know exactly where we stand - and everyone has a unique and instilled view on each issue. With so much response diversity, let's switch over to second person.
Are you a Democrat or Republican? OK, now are you a liberal or moderate? Are you sure? Have you ever considered the Tea Party, Libertarian, or even being Independent?
Now to first person. If only I could accurately explain what each stand for. Truthfully speaking, I just know the basics. Enough to know where I stand.
And on to third person. When I think of Democrats, I think of church camp where we all get in a circle and hold hands. Say some prayers and help out the world! Donations (ehem taxes, though that's not voluntary for the most part) are seized and distributed to those in need. The preacher, though, he dresses so nicely and this is his only job. No wonder he's so happy all the time. God is on his side and so is the cash before it goes out to the needy??
Republicans. They are rebels in their own right. What what they justify to themselves as right. Abortion equals murder even when the definition of life has not clearly been defined and when the root of problem may not exactly be that woman has a fetus. The issue goes deeper: poor and incomplete sex education, a proper role model, rape. And then there's healthcare. I'm sorry, only Republicans and their grandchildren are allowed the best; not the struggling workforce nor those who were recently laid off because the Repub's wealthy friends ignored signs of a collapse as long as money was coming in.
Then there's the Tea Party and Libertarians who don't agree with taxes and believe that everyone should fend for themselves no matter what. That's how I interpret it. If anyone would like to correct me then I would welcome that. Problem is, the message is not coming off strong enough and their's no champion. I can see that taxes, quite blantantly, sucks, but what is the answer then? Smaller government, but then there will be those who take advantage of the unregulated system. It's not so easy, this is a capitalist country. People are greed and selfish here. That seems to be how the economy just collapsed in the first place and why many are in debt. Wall Street had no rules and credit card companies didn't either. And now, look at America.
I guess there's always the Green and Constitution, however, they kind of impose ideas onto people that I would allow to more of a personal decision. I love God and His environment, don't get me wrong, but again, I am in this country which is trying with all its might to emphasize freedom. I realize that if I had to write an article called "Why Congress made this law" that money would be mention threes times for every mention of freedom, but hey, there other countries worse off. That is not an excuse, but it is a realization.
In the meantime, I'd like to vote independently. Yes, Independent. That is my choice for making choices on many an issue without having to play along with the rest of the party.
Want to know the stances on issues? Party on here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_parties_in_the_United_States#Modern_U.S._political_party_system
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Congress = Bad Role Models
The word is that Congress is trying to determine how best to spend it's money (our money?) We have Pat Quinn, governor of Illinois and his best friend (that's a joke, seriously) sparring about who can spend and save better. We have the auto-immunization of the Congress about how to pay for health care. And then we have schools upon more schools closing their doors.
So this is what I'm thinking, as we don't have enough money to keep it in the family, i.e. the United States, then maybe we should stop spending so much in other countries. Here's who I understand it.
Our military personnel in roughly 135 countries. Our most-known are Afghanistan and Iraq. Sending people overseas is costing over 36 percent of our budget. That's a huge chunk and also not a very good example. But we're still internally split over gun control laws. It's like the mother government is saying, well, we can use most of our paycheck for guns and bombs but, you, child, I'm not sure...I don't really trust that you won't harm innocent people. I don't even really need numbers because it's been so inaccurate; there are too many innocent bystanders who are killed in the midst of the wars we're fighting and we see it reported everyday. Us, citizens shouldn't really be trusting you mama government. Fighting over welfare. Really? I would rather my child eat than me buying a weapon.
Our GDP is also a little on the down side. Take a look at your shirt. Look closely. Where was it made? Your watch? Your socks? Chances are they were not made here. It's not that we lack the people to work. Call me crazy but at least one out of every ten people are looking for something. Here's an idea. Oh man. How about we start producing our own goods instead of spending, spending, spending. There mom goes again, going to the store to buy apples when we already have some perfect ones at home.
I'm trying to budget a little and live within my means all the while keeping up with my school debt (which is a whole different blog.) If I ever need any guidance or counseling, I will make sure not to follow in the footsteps of our government. Unless, that is, I could ask for money out of thin air and then let my great, great granddaughter worry about it. Oh wait. That's another bad idea.
So this is what I'm thinking, as we don't have enough money to keep it in the family, i.e. the United States, then maybe we should stop spending so much in other countries. Here's who I understand it.
Our military personnel in roughly 135 countries. Our most-known are Afghanistan and Iraq. Sending people overseas is costing over 36 percent of our budget. That's a huge chunk and also not a very good example. But we're still internally split over gun control laws. It's like the mother government is saying, well, we can use most of our paycheck for guns and bombs but, you, child, I'm not sure...I don't really trust that you won't harm innocent people. I don't even really need numbers because it's been so inaccurate; there are too many innocent bystanders who are killed in the midst of the wars we're fighting and we see it reported everyday. Us, citizens shouldn't really be trusting you mama government. Fighting over welfare. Really? I would rather my child eat than me buying a weapon.
Our GDP is also a little on the down side. Take a look at your shirt. Look closely. Where was it made? Your watch? Your socks? Chances are they were not made here. It's not that we lack the people to work. Call me crazy but at least one out of every ten people are looking for something. Here's an idea. Oh man. How about we start producing our own goods instead of spending, spending, spending. There mom goes again, going to the store to buy apples when we already have some perfect ones at home.
I'm trying to budget a little and live within my means all the while keeping up with my school debt (which is a whole different blog.) If I ever need any guidance or counseling, I will make sure not to follow in the footsteps of our government. Unless, that is, I could ask for money out of thin air and then let my great, great granddaughter worry about it. Oh wait. That's another bad idea.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
(Tap) Excuse me, do you know who this healthcare belongs to?
Who thinks we'll be able to get it passed? By "we," I mean Republicans, Democrats, Liberals, or -even - the House, the Senate, and the Media. And by "who," I mean the rest of us, or what Stephen Colbert calls "nation."
Republicans want to hold on to the status quo. If one could just close his or her eyes, then health care prices will not go up. And with a shaky economy rocked by high unemployment, that would be just perfect. So OK, now that that's, who wants to go to Hawaii for a conference!?!
Democrats are looking to expand the network in hopes that over time, the country will save money and be healthier, although the numbers game is being confused back and forth. While some say the next few generations will inherit the burden of picking up the hefty bill and some believe that we have already abused the 'living beyond our country's means' approach will further our financial crisis, others say premiums will go down and there will be a little healthy competition among providers to break even.
Then there is the House, the Senate, and the President sparring. The House wants a public option, the Senate wants an alternative to a public option. Both would require employees to have insurance, which is a good thing. The Senate is a bit more generous when it comes to subsidy. The House bill will tax the rich, and the Senate will make cuts and add new taxes. Many differences and much , well...politics. Coach Obama would like to bring the team together, but will they play along?
And let's not forgot who expands the wrong information, ehem, Media. Our news medium spins like Evan Lysacek. CNN, MSNBC with all their charts and graphs and scare tactics. It's best to do some researching before taking their word for it. The implication is that our current system is the best in world. If that is, then how is that we are the #1 spender of all the world? Health care is a huge chunk of our GDP. Huge. And that's no exaggerations. What is an exaggeration is our beloved Rush Limbaugh will leave the U.S. to go to Costa Rica. Well buddy, I hope they can what you need for your heart attacks.
With all the craziness, it seems that health care belongs to THEM. Shouldn't it belong to US? Congress, they have the best plans. The Media, more than likely they can afford the best plans too. Rush himself is still alive which means he's got a great doc. But we are the majority. We are the ones who are suffering the costs. This means we'll have to rally ourselves and make sure that the people in Capitol Hill or on camera listen and hear us. Write your Congressman. Tell him or her what your situation is. Take it. Health care belongs to us.
Republicans want to hold on to the status quo. If one could just close his or her eyes, then health care prices will not go up. And with a shaky economy rocked by high unemployment, that would be just perfect. So OK, now that that's, who wants to go to Hawaii for a conference!?!
Democrats are looking to expand the network in hopes that over time, the country will save money and be healthier, although the numbers game is being confused back and forth. While some say the next few generations will inherit the burden of picking up the hefty bill and some believe that we have already abused the 'living beyond our country's means' approach will further our financial crisis, others say premiums will go down and there will be a little healthy competition among providers to break even.
Then there is the House, the Senate, and the President sparring. The House wants a public option, the Senate wants an alternative to a public option. Both would require employees to have insurance, which is a good thing. The Senate is a bit more generous when it comes to subsidy. The House bill will tax the rich, and the Senate will make cuts and add new taxes. Many differences and much , well...politics. Coach Obama would like to bring the team together, but will they play along?
And let's not forgot who expands the wrong information, ehem, Media. Our news medium spins like Evan Lysacek. CNN, MSNBC with all their charts and graphs and scare tactics. It's best to do some researching before taking their word for it. The implication is that our current system is the best in world. If that is, then how is that we are the #1 spender of all the world? Health care is a huge chunk of our GDP. Huge. And that's no exaggerations. What is an exaggeration is our beloved Rush Limbaugh will leave the U.S. to go to Costa Rica. Well buddy, I hope they can what you need for your heart attacks.
With all the craziness, it seems that health care belongs to THEM. Shouldn't it belong to US? Congress, they have the best plans. The Media, more than likely they can afford the best plans too. Rush himself is still alive which means he's got a great doc. But we are the majority. We are the ones who are suffering the costs. This means we'll have to rally ourselves and make sure that the people in Capitol Hill or on camera listen and hear us. Write your Congressman. Tell him or her what your situation is. Take it. Health care belongs to us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
